Periodic Table - Forum - Chemistry Tools - Resources - Link to Us

Postassium Nitrate + sucrose formula help

Search by name or symbol:
FAQ | Search |  Register!Profile | Private Messages | Log in
 
Author Message
pelpel
A really tough bot, or a member.


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:39 pm    Post subject: Postassium Nitrate + sucrose formula help Reply with quote

Hey guys. I have a chemistry project due soon and I am doing a potassium nitrate + sucrose reaction to make a "smoke bomb". I have done the reaction and everything but I need to explain what exactly is going on in the reaction and determine the complete balanced formula equasion. I have searched trying to find this but I can't seem to find anything relevant.

Here is a link to the reaction that I am doing
http://chemistry.about.com/od/demonstrationsexperiments/ss/smokebomb_2.htm

If you could help that would be great, thanks.
Back to top
Macak
Junior Member


Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

9.6 KNO3 + C12H22O11 --> 4.8 K2CO3 + 7.2 CO2 + 11 H2O + 4.8 N2 (approx.)

So, 970g KNO3 and 342g sucrose, which is 74% KNO3 and 26% sucrose. This produces 662g of potassium carbonate. And, as you know, in a well made (ie, intimately mixed) LE of this type there is little slag or "pearling" left after combustion. Meaning that all 662g of potassium carbonate is dispersed as smoke (well, and droplets flung about, but largely as smoke). In other words, 50% of the mass of the charge ends up as smoke.
Increasing the amount of fuel decreases the %age of KNO3, therefore decreasing the amount of K2CO3 that can be made, reducing the max possible amount of smoke. Also, burning will be less vigorous, so it will be less well dispersed.
I think the idea to use sub-optimal amounts of oxidiser came from the common belief that "incomplete combustion produces smoke", which is not always the case...
Back to top
pelpel
A really tough bot, or a member.


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you very much...It is much appreciated Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Chemicool Forum -> Computational Chemistry All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1